Judgement Briefs

Administrative Law

Indian National Congress v. Institute of Social Welfare

(2002) 5 SCC 685

Citation
(2002) 5 SCC 685
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
2002

Facts

  • Kerala High Court directed the Election Commission to consider de-registering political parties involved in hartals/bandhs.
  • The Election Commission argued that it only had power to register political parties under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act.
  • It said registration was a quasi-judicial function, so it could not later review/de-register unless statute gave such power.
  • Respondents argued registration was administrative, so de-registration power should be implied.

Issue

  • Whether the Election Commission’s power to register a political party under Section 29A is administrative or quasi-judicial.

Rule

  • A function can be quasi-judicial even if there are not two contesting parties.
  • If a statutory authority:
  • decides rights/status of a person or body;
  • must consider material;
  • must give hearing;
  • must apply its mind judicially, then the function is quasi-judicial.

Application

  • The Court looked closely at Section 29A.
  • Section 29A does not make registration automatic.
  • The Election Commission must:
  • examine the application;
  • consider all particulars and relevant factors;
  • give representatives of the association a reasonable opportunity of being heard;
  • decide whether to register or refuse registration.
  • This showed that the Commission was not doing a simple clerical/administrative act.
  • Registration gives a political party statutory status and legal advantages.
  • Refusal to register affects the body’s legal position.
  • Therefore, the decision affects rights/status and requires fair decision-making.
  • The absence of a traditional “lis” between two opposing parties was not decisive.
  • The real question was whether the statute required the authority to act judicially.
  • Since Section 29A required hearing and reasoned consideration, the function was quasi-judicial.
  • On de-registration, the Court said that because registration is quasi-judicial, the Election Commission cannot review or cancel it unless the statute expressly gives review/de-registration power.
  • De-registration would seriously affect the statutory status of a political party, so such power cannot be implied casually.

Conclusion

  • The Supreme Court held that registration of political parties under Section 29A is a quasi-judicial function.
  • The Election Commission has no general power to de-register a political party unless such power is expressly given by law.
  • Use this case for: classification of administrative functions and when an act becomes quasi-judicial.