Administrative Law
Indian National Congress v. Institute of Social Welfare
(2002) 5 SCC 685
- Citation
- (2002) 5 SCC 685
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date
- 2002
Facts
- Kerala High Court directed the Election Commission to consider de-registering political parties involved in hartals/bandhs.
- The Election Commission argued that it only had power to register political parties under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act.
- It said registration was a quasi-judicial function, so it could not later review/de-register unless statute gave such power.
- Respondents argued registration was administrative, so de-registration power should be implied.
Issue
- Whether the Election Commission’s power to register a political party under Section 29A is administrative or quasi-judicial.
Rule
- A function can be quasi-judicial even if there are not two contesting parties.
- If a statutory authority:
- decides rights/status of a person or body;
- must consider material;
- must give hearing;
- must apply its mind judicially, then the function is quasi-judicial.
Application
- The Court looked closely at Section 29A.
- Section 29A does not make registration automatic.
- The Election Commission must:
- examine the application;
- consider all particulars and relevant factors;
- give representatives of the association a reasonable opportunity of being heard;
- decide whether to register or refuse registration.
- This showed that the Commission was not doing a simple clerical/administrative act.
- Registration gives a political party statutory status and legal advantages.
- Refusal to register affects the body’s legal position.
- Therefore, the decision affects rights/status and requires fair decision-making.
- The absence of a traditional “lis” between two opposing parties was not decisive.
- The real question was whether the statute required the authority to act judicially.
- Since Section 29A required hearing and reasoned consideration, the function was quasi-judicial.
- On de-registration, the Court said that because registration is quasi-judicial, the Election Commission cannot review or cancel it unless the statute expressly gives review/de-registration power.
- De-registration would seriously affect the statutory status of a political party, so such power cannot be implied casually.
Conclusion
- The Supreme Court held that registration of political parties under Section 29A is a quasi-judicial function.
- The Election Commission has no general power to de-register a political party unless such power is expressly given by law.
- Use this case for: classification of administrative functions and when an act becomes quasi-judicial.