Administrative Law
Mineral Development Ltd. v. State of Bihar
AIR 1960 SC 468; (1960) 2 SCR 909
- Citation
- AIR 1960 SC 468; (1960) 2 SCR 909
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date
- 15 December 1959
- Bench
- B.P. Sinha, CJ, K. Subba Rao, P.B. Gajendragadkar, K.C. Das Gupta and J.C. Shah, JJ.
Facts
- Mineral Development Ltd. held mining rights in Bihar.
- Government action was taken adversely affecting the company’s lease/interests.
- The company alleged that the Minister concerned was personally biased.
- There was background political/personal hostility.
Issue
- Whether administrative action is invalid if influenced by personal bias or mala fides.
Rule
- Administrative power must be exercised for the statutory purpose.
- Personal hostility, political rivalry or private motive cannot influence the decision.
- Bias may arise from personal interest, hostility or prior involvement.
- Mala fide exercise of power is invalid.
Application
- The Court examined the surrounding circumstances, not merely the formal order.
- Even if the order appears lawful on paper, courts can look at whether the power was used for an improper purpose.
- The Minister’s personal hostility created serious doubt about impartiality.
- Where the decision-maker is personally interested in harming the affected party, the decision cannot be treated as fair.
- Administrative discretion is given for public purpose, not personal vendetta.
- The Court therefore treated the action as vitiated by mala fides/bias.
Conclusion
- The Supreme Court invalidated the action.
- It held that administrative decisions affected by personal bias or mala fides cannot stand.
- Use this case for: personal hostility of the authority can vitiate administrative action.